Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 549

CIS scholarships under review

0

By Rebecca LindelThe Ubyssey (University of British Columbia)

VANCOUVER (CUP) – Canada’s university sports league is looking to change its scholarship rules to allow full-ride awards for student athletes by next year.
“The principle is to keep the best student athletes in Canada,” said Clint Hamilton, president of Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS) and University of Victoria’s director of athletics. “Currently, the scholarship situation is such that it’s limiting our ability to do that.
“Financially, we are not able to compete with our counterparts across the line in the NCAA.”
The maximum amount of award money CIS athletes are eligible for is the cost of tuition and ancillary fees. Meanwhile, the American NCAA league offers additional funding for residence and living expenses, making it an attractive option for talented Canadian athletes.
CIS is exploring what Hamilton calls “a flexible scholarship model.” This model would remove the per-student cap, which would allow Canadian universities to give free rides for key players. It would still limit the total amount of money available per sport, however.
For example, a basketball program could have a scholarship budget of $30,000 under the proposed model, and they would have to determine how many full-ride scholarships were offered out of that pot.
The University of British Columbia (UBC) has been one of the key players in initiating the review and have long considered making the jump into the NCAA because it would give the school more financial flexibility. UBC gave out over $500,000 in athletic scholarships this year, but have argued that they are unable to keep the best local athletes in Canada due to scholarship restrictions.
While it would help Canadian schools retain talent, UBC’s athletic director Bob Philip said flexibility isn’t enough – the league needs to rethink scholarship eligibility rules as well.
“We think they should adopt the NCAA rule and the NCAA rule says if you are eligible to play sports, you are eligible to receive an athletic award,” Philip said.
CIS student athletes need to keep a 60 per cent average, be enrolled in three classes during the season, and gain 18 credits each year to be eligible to play sports. To earn scholarships, athletes need an 80 per cent average out of high school and at least a 65 per cent average at the end of your first year. Students beyond their first year must keep a 65 per cent average, with the exception of Ontario, which requires a 70 per cent average.
Hamilton said any proposals to change the eligibility rules would doom any other changes to failure when the CIS membership votes on them in June.
“I don’t believe at this point that there is an appetite to want to lower the academic requirements that are on the books as part of a more expanded financial offering in terms of scholarship,” Hamilton said.
Philip said that even if scholarship rules do change, there’s no guarantee UBC would close the NCAA door.
The NCAA is an important brand for athletes and playing in the American league would help attract the best Canadian athletes to UBC, Philip said, adding that it would also raise the level of play.
“A Canadian student athlete should be able to study in Canada and have the same opportunities. Why should they have to go to the States?”
Still, UBC’s vice-president of students Brian Sullivan said it would be an important step towards resolving some of the issues pushing UBC towards the NCAA.
“One very important positive elements is the scholarship flexibility … If that report comes back and it’s a favourable action with respect to eligibility for scholarship and flexibility for scholarships … that would be a positive influence that UBC will take into account when deciding whether or not to apply for NCAA membership,” Sullivan said.

Murderball

0

By Kim KeitnerSports Contributor

The gymnasium floor echoes around the sound of 14 rumbling wheels. Several voices jockey for attention. “Over here! Pass it to Steven! Go for the corner! Cover Gordie!” But Gordie, cradling the ball in one arm and spinning with his free hand, finds an opening and wheels across the marked blue line to the cheers of his teammates.
Off the court, everything the self-proclaimed “quads” do is dictated by what they cannot do – walk. In Gordie’s world routine is paramount; being slow, a side effect. But here in this gymnasium he maneuvers his wheelchair expertly and it moves almost gracefully across the synthetic rubber floor. There’s nothing slow about Gordie as he and his teammates wheel back to the opposite side to start the game all over again. It’s impossible to remember whether Gordie’s team is up or down, no one here is keeping score. That is not the purpose of today. It’s the first practice of the season and it’s clear that the boys are just happy to be playing murderball again.
Gordie, Rob and Steven are the quads. Gordie throws a ball at Steven as he challenges his quad status, “Steven here’s practically para,” (meaning paraplegic), and jokingly implies that he’s been spoiled by his extra mobility. Steven, used to Gordie’s teasing, shrugs and catches the ball. Gordie had a diving accident and Steven was in a car accident when they were both just kids. Both of their accidents happened long enough ago that joking about it has become customary. Besides, razzing each other is what jocks do. They razz on the “ABs” too – the able-bodies. They also call them “walkies”. Rob’s brother Stevie, Charles and James are walkies. They come because they’re friends and family but also because murderball is fun.
Gordie says they’re not supposed to call it murderball anymore – something about scaring off potential players. The official name is “quad rugby,” though the name is about the only thing it has in common with the sport. Quad rugby is played with a small volleyball on a basketball-sized court with goal lines marked by cones. According to quadrugby.com, “the object of the game is to score a goal (one point) by crossing the goal line with possession of the ball while the opposing team is defending that goal.”
Each team has four players and those players’ functionality ratings, when combined, can be no higher than eight. When a quad is first injured, doctors and occupational therapists team up and assign him/her a number between 0.5 to 3.5. It’s a functionality rating based on several measures including hand dexterity, motor function and sensation.
Gordie has sensation in the chest and above and limited hand dexterity. The doctors gave him a one. He played for the Canada quad rugby team in 2006 and says keeping fit is what motivates him to play. The simple act of bending down to retrieve a dropped item can be complicated when you’re in a chair and it doesn’t help when you’ve got a gut hindering your way.
The boys play for two hours, only stopping once for water and twice when someone yells “equipment!” meaning something such as a loose wheel or a ripped glove needs fixing. They wear the gloves to protect their hands and wrists from chaffing against the wheels. They use gardening gloves, work gloves, sporting gloves – basically any glove that has a match and isn’t ripped to shreds.
On the court there is no mercy. It’s a full contact sport with chair-to-chair collisions, although no personal contact is allowed. Gordie laughs every time he crashes his chair into an opponent and eventually Jamie gets knocked so hard his chair flips over. Someone says, “It’s about time.”
These boys are not so delicate.
After the game the boys gather together to disassemble chairs, toss sweaty gloves in smelly bags and talk about how out of shape they are after a season off court. Just like any sport the physical activity pays off and it’s clear that the boys are feeling great. A new season is here and today the games have just begun.

Dinos dismantle Huskies in final four match-up

0

By Joel TichinoffSports Editor

The script for this year’s Uteck Bowl was worthy of Hollywood. Former St. Mary’s head football coach, Blake Nill returned to Halifax at the helm of the University of Calgary Dinosaurs to do battle with his former protégé and offensive co-ordinator Steve Sumarah, who stepped up as head coach after Nill abruptly left for the west.
Nill and Sumarah worked together for years going back to the early ‘90s at St. Francis Xavier. Both later moved to St. Mary’s, piloting two Huskies teams to back-to-back Vanier Cup titles in 200 and 2001. But the Nill/Sumarah comrades-turned-enemies story would only serve as a B-plot in the build up to the 2009 Uteck Bowl.
Since leaving the Huskies for the Dinos last season, Nill has lured no less than six Huskies football players into transferring from St. Mary’s to U.C., including star quarterback and 2007 Hec Crighton Trophy-winner Eric Glavic. Once the jewel in the Huskies football crown, Glavic mysteriously pulled up stakes following the 2008 season and transferred to U.C. sighting “personal” reasons. In 2009, Glavic and Nill led the Dinos to a 9-1 regular season record, and the six-foot-six star pivot was once again nominated for the Crighton as CIS football’s MVP in 2009.
Calgary edged the University of Saskatchewan in the Canada West championship 39-38. SMU easily handled the X-men 31-22 for the Atlantic championship title. The Dinos finished the regular season 9-1 and ranked second nationally. The Huskies went 8-1 and finished sixth in CIS rankings.
While conventional wisdom would give Calgary the advantage, the Huskies have won seven consecutive AUS titles and have advanced to the final four nine times in the last 11 years and have made it to the Vanier Cup five times in the last decade. Whatever the rankings, St. Mary’s is a football powerhouse with a strong championship pedigree.
Yet the hype around this year’s Uteck Bowl was focused on the drama of the field; Glavic, Nill and the five other former Huskies who jumped ship were coming back to face their old team in the stadium and city where they were once hailed as heroes. To top it all off, those most keenly following the epic storyline dared to dream one step further; could sophomore QB Jack Creighton, Glavic’s replacement on the SMU roster, thrust into this storm of bitter rivalry and resentment, emerge in a “star-is-born” moment as the bona fide next Eric Glavic and propel his team past the Dinos and the Vanier Cup game?
As often happens with hyped up events, reality did not measure up to expectation. The Huskies imploded in the first quarter. Glavic’s role was superceded by Calgary’s Offensive and Defensive teams’ domination of SMU in virtually every aspect of the game. The receiving Dinos drove the Huskies back to the Calgary 49 on the kick-off return and Huskies all-Canadian defensive linebacker Dan Shutte, the keystone of SMU defence, went down with an injury before 80 seconds had elapsed in the first quarter. Battered back deep into their own territory, the Huskies quickly surrendered a Safety following two incomplete passes, the first of many, from Creighton. A Dinos field-goal followed quickly putting Calgary up 5-0 early.
The high-water mark of individual drama and the Huskies hopes came early in the first when SMU receiver Ahmed Borhot intercepted a Glavic pass, Glavic himself being forced off the field with an injury following an aggressive sack by SMU’s Devon Hicks, which drew an unnecessary roughness penalty to the Huskies. Former Dino starter Deke Junior, who had only seen enough playing time since 2008 for 23 passes, replaced Glavic in the shot-gun position as Sumarah and Nill exchanged heated words on the side-lines. Whatever advantaged the Dinos had momentarily evaporated amid wild taunting from the Husky faithful with Glavic out of commission.
However Glavic returned and the Dinos quickly silenced the home crowd. UC’s Michael Lau, one of many Dinos touted as future CFLers, intercepted a Creighton pass and the resulting possession was turned into long pass to Dino Richard Snyder deep in the Huskies’ zone to give Calgary a 12-0 lead.
The Dinos made SMU look sluggish and ineffective from the start and strong defense left Huskies’ offence stifled while UC’s offensive line fiercely protected Glavic, giving him plenty of time to make passes and complex plays. With 59 seconds left in the first quarter Glavic handed the ball off to Matt Walter, who found a gap in the Saint Mary’s line, breaking free for a 69 yard run for his 10th touchdown of 2009. In total Calgary had 198 net yards in the first 15 minutes of play. SMU had 17 and did not complete its first pass until well into the second quarter.

The Gaels of November
Queen’s University beat two-time defending Vanier Champions Laval 33-30 at Richardson Stadium in Kingston in a major upset. Laval allowed a total of 60 points to be scored against them in total in the 2009 season and were heavily favoured to repeat as national champions. The Gaels will meet the Dinos in Quebec City for the 2009 Vanier Cup on Saturday, Nov. 28.

Wanted and desired

By Dalhousie Gazette Staff

Grade: A-

Recently the Dal Art Gallery screened a documentary about Roman Polanski, the famous Polish movie director whose life has been the subject of sheer media frenzy over the years. Roman Polanski’s life has been wrought with tragedy, but he has also realized great success. This documentary allows us to see beyond what was presented by the media in times of tragedy in his life.
The documentary was released in 2008 but is probably gaining more recognition now than at that time, because Polanski was recently arrested in Europe at a Swiss film festival for a crime he committed in California in the 1970s. I’ll explain how Polanski ended up fleeing the United States and retreating to Europe, where he was eventually arrested many years later.
Polanski’s parents were killed in concentration camps during the Holocaust, when he was young. He managed, however, to build a name for himself in cinema and eventually ended up working in Hollywood. He became well known world wide for controversial films such as Rosemary’s Baby, and worked and played with famous actors and film industry big-shots.
Despite the setback of losing his parents so young, Polanski managed to accomplish a lot, and eventually married the love of his life, Sharon Tate. He met Sharon while filming a movie in the U.K. He cast her as the leading actress and their love affair bloomed from that point forward. Eventually she became pregnant. The film shows a substantial amount of footage of Sharon and Roman together, both of their home and their time working together. It’s easy to see the adoration they had for each other, and to understand the incredible tragedy of what ensued. While Polanski was shooting a movie in Europe, he received the news that his then pregnant wife had been brutally murdered by members of the Manson Family.
The film does a tasteful job of presenting the events surrounding Tate’s murder. The media at the time had pounced on the bizarre and freakish nature of her death and made her out to be a sort of cult follower. Charles Manson, an ex-con and drifter, had gathered a cult following and command its members to commit murder.
One night, as Tate entertained guests at her home, Manson sent his minions to take the lives of her and her guests. They were not only killed, but also brutally tortured. Polanski’s life would never be the same. It’s clear through the interviews conducted with friends of Polanski that he was, in many ways, defeated and ruined by what happened to his wife. Several years later, he would commit a crime surrounded by controversy, and consequently fuel a media circus.
Polanski, while taking pictures of a 13-year-old girl for a photo shoot, ended up having sex with her. The girl’s mother had allowed her to go to the shoot, and Polanski and the girl were alone when this took place.  He ended up facing numerous sexual assault charges and the case was followed relentlessly by the media.
What we know is that, eventually, Polanski skipped his final sentencing and fled to Europe. He is still wanted in America. What the film tells us, though, is that he had no intention of fleeing at all until things later became unfair.
The lawyers who were involved in the case at the time speak often in the film of the injustices surrounding the trial and the media coverage. The “victim” of the alleged assault was equally disgusted by the media frenzy surrounding the case. Judge Rittenband, who presided over the case, seemed to thrive on the media attention and went so far as to hold press conferences in his chambers. He based his sentencing decisions on what the public wanted and played with members of the court like puppets on strings. Polanski and lawyers for both the defence and prosecution became convinced that he was untrustworthy, which fuelled Polanski to depart for Europe rather than receive an additional sentence.
Since that time, he has remarried and has several children. He does, however, remain wanted in the United States.
The film really is interesting, and very well done. There are in-depth interviews with the victim, Polanski, his friends and colleagues, and with those involved in the case. What Polanski did was extremely controversial, but the controversy surrounding the case was perhaps just as shocking. It seems as though the public continues to thrive on the downfalls and mishaps of famous people in particular, which makes it difficult to form a solid opinion.
This film is definitely worth a peek.

‘Lucky are those who are poets’

By Dalhousie Gazette Staff

Anne Sexton writes, “with used furniture poets make trees.” This is true of three women who read at the DUASC reading series in the University archives on Wednesday Nov. 18. Carolyn Smart, Carol Langille and Sue Goyette are all published by Brick Books, the Canadian all-poetry publisher.
As well as a poet, Carolyn Smart is a professor of Creative Writing and Canadian Literature at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. After years of confessional writing, Smart is now writing narrative poetry. Her fifth collection, Hooked, narrates from the point of view of seven infamous women, “each of them was hooked on, and her life contorted by, an addiction or obsession.”
In the poem Written on The Flesh, Smart writes from the point of view of the British murderer of children, Myra Hindley. During her childhood in England, Smart’s father would read headlines from the London Times about the murderer. Smart also drew on her own feelings of anger to create the murderer’s voice. Written On The Flesh addresses the classism that took place in England during the time of the murders. Biting and poignant social criticism comes through Hindley’s voice re-created in Smart’s poem.
Carol Langille and Sue Goyette are two poets and professors of Dalhousie’s Creative Writing Department. All women spoke on the importance of their own lives coursing through the veins of their work, or becoming it. For Goyette, “there is a difference between autobiography, and the truth. I tell small lies in my work to tell a bigger truth. What’s not written is equally important.” Smart now combines her own emotions with her artistic temperament in order to produce biting narrative poetry. On the cathartic opportunity to document life, Langille says, “lucky are those who are poets.”

You can find Carolyn Smart’s Hooked at local booksellers. More information on how to acquire the books of Langille, Smart, and Goyette is available through Brick Books. www.brickbooks.ca.

Dal’s new Musicology branches academic study and popular culture

By Nick LaugherStaff Contributor

Bombarded with images of scantily clad singers, lip-syncing bubble-gum pop songs, it’s not hard to see why the world is hesitant to consider contemporary music as anything more than frivolous entertainment. On the other side of the coin, we are given a picture of stuffy old composers, writing absurdly complex symphonies that scare people from even talking about music for fear of appearing uneducated. However, Dalhousie is taking a stance and embarking on a quest to quell some of the myths and misconceptions about popular music.
In offering a new graduate studies program in musicology – the first new graduate program at Dalhousie in over a decade – the university hopes to unite the contrasting factions of academic study and popular music. The program will allow students and faculty to look at the social and cultural impact of music entwined with history, gender issues, race and politics.
“It’s a look at music on the broader scale,” says Steven Baur, a professor of Musicology at Dalhousie. “Soundtracks, songs in advertising or political campaigns, composers … they effect us and the culture around us and we don’t even realize it.”
Professor Baur, like many of the faculty in the musicology program, is a relatively new addition. Only in the last 10 years has Dalhousie garnered a huge following in the area of musicology, marking an influx of new professors, or as Baur refers to them “fresh musicology blood.”
The intention of the Musicology program, which has already attracted a slew of international attention, is to investigate the way music affects our world.
“We don’t just look at the way music relates to social and cultural events over the course of time,” says Baur. “We look at how it contributes to these things.”
The program is largely interdisciplinary, not only allowing but heavily encouraging students to take courses from other faculties. Baur, who also co-edited the book The Beatles and Philosophy, is adamant about the idea of studying music in relation to different fields of study. Not just content with borrowing insights from the social sciences or philosophy, musicology aims to provide a new angle on these issues.
“The appearance of musicology has always been archaic composers, using mystical language to seem authoritative and alienating people from talking about it” says Baur.
The program aims to remove that air of arrogance and intimidation that musical studies carry with it, believing that music is an extremely universal and expressive thing that has infiltrated our culture and history for centuries.
Beginning with general introductory, courses that outline things such as research methods, bibliographies and the history of musicology, the program then opens up and students have the opportunity to take specialized courses that are tailored to each professors’ area of expertise. There are experts on everything from pop music, to opera, to contemporary Canadian composers.
Professors have been offering a new Music and Culture lecture series to the public in an effort to introduce the new field of study to the Dalhousie community.
David Schroeder’s lecture on the use of the piano as a seductive instrument in Hitchcock films was one such introduction. Schroeder’s lecture gave the public a preview of the type of material the program would offer, and served as an intro to the symbiotic relationship between music and culture. While Schroeder used the piano to expose the rhythmic way in which silent movies were composed, other professors will draw their own connections from music to anything from racial inequality to the way we interact as a society.
“This is a new, brighter era of Musicology,” remarks Baur. “We’re offering a very wide range of topics in an effort to amplify the idea of Musicology, so people realize how relevant it truly is.”
The program is open to the idea of what can be called music by setting aside the lingering classical bias and accepting a diverse array of music.
“Musicology, traditionally, was largely taught by the specialists for the specialists,” Baur says regretfully. “Music is deeply relevant to our culture and we want to be the translators; we want to make it accessible.”

4.48 Psychosis gets a 10

By Delia MacphersonStaff Contributor

In 1999, English playwright Sarah Kane hung herself in the bathroom of a hospital. The last thing she wrote was a book of poems about the mentally insane called 4.48 Psychosis.
Director Simon Bloom took the poems and turned them into a play. He gave it characters, stage direction and blocking. Bloom, a fourth-year student at the University of King’s College, said it was a collaborative effort.
“A lot of it came out through discussion with the actors,” says Bloom. “We would sit down and look at a scene and say, ‘What’s actually going on in the scene? What point is she trying to express in this particular fragment?’”
Set in a hospital room inside Sarah Kane’s mind, the floor was painted white and four large white sheets hung from the ceiling. The play was presented with the audience members completely surrounding the actors in a square, with the action in the middle.
“Some of the scenes take place in the real world and some take place, as (Kane) says, ‘A consolidated consciousness resides in a darkened banqueting hall near the ceiling of the mind.’”
Ella Bedard took on Bloom’s interpretation of Sarah Kane. Her performance was extremely well delivered. Playing someone in a mental institute can easily be over-acted but Bedard was very natural. Bedard provided her audience with insight into the mind of a person with a mental health problem. There is a theory that everyone has this dark place deep inside. Bedard most certainly tapped in to hers with honesty.
The dialogue was captivating because it was unsettlingly relatable.
“I am guilty. I have lost interest in other people. I can’t eat. I cannot overcome my loneliness, my fear, my disgust. My hips are too big. I dislike the look of my genitals.”
Jennalee Desjardins and Lewis Wynne-Jones mostly played the doctors who worked with Kane in the mental institution. They focused a lot of attention on physicalizing how Kane perceived them. At one point they wore white masks made of plaster on the tops of their heads and pulled white lab coats over their faces. The result was two scurrying, creature-like, starch white, hunched over “doctors”.  They had a clip-board that they passed back and forth. Their fingers curled and they walked on the heels of their feet. They were absolutely terrifying.
“It was awesome,” says Bloom. “I happened to get to work with Louis, Ella and Jennalee and each one of them has their own individual strengths. They’re all multitalented. That’s what’s so amazing about them – they can do both the movement and the acting.”
The lighting in the show was particularly interesting. Florescent, hospital-looking lights hung from the ceiling, lighting the entire room up brightly. The audience was completely visible. Not just a little bit. It was as if we were all sitting in a hospital room watching this sick woman who could feel all our eyes on her. So effective!
The lighting changed back and forth from dark with spotlights in the centre to bright fluorescents. Each time this happened, the audience members cringed slightly while their eyes adjusted.
One scene that was particularly difficult to watch was when Jennalee and Ella stood in the centre a foot or so a part and both were lit by two different spotlights. Jennalee played “Ella’s body”, while Ella played her mind. Ella began saying violent words: “Flicker, slash, burn, dab, punch, ring.”
She repeated the same words over and over. Jennalee, in the mean time, had choreographed specific body movements and jerks to each word. Ella spoke faster and faster. Jennalee’s body is thrashed about.
The audience could feel the pain and relentlessness and lack of control of the mind through a physicalizing. So fascinating. It gave me chills.
“I wanted to try and capture the feeling when you’re lying in a hospital bed and you look up and you see all these healthy people standing around you,” says Bloom. “It created a really interesting dynamic.”
4.48 Psychosis was the best piece of theatre I have seen in months. It took risks and was set in a controversial environment that made you uncomfortable, which captivated the audience.
“The play is uncompromising,” adds Bloom. “It shows you depression and it shows you illness and it doesn’t pull any punches.”

Dragana’s Inferno

By Hilary BeaumontCopy Editor

Dragana Varagic’s bright, brown eyes dart from side to side, as if watching a hummingbird flit around her sparsely decorated Dalhousie Arts Centre office.
“It’s not what you expect,” she says slowly, with a reticent smile.
Varagic is directing Dal Theatre’s winter production of Dante’s Divinus Inferno, which opens the evening of Tuesday, Nov. 24. The short script by Serbian playwright Nenad Prokic is a post-modern interpretation of the first of three poems in Dante’s Divine Comedy. Inferno follows Dante and Virgil into the depths of hell to meet sinners whose eternal punishments fit their crimes during life.
“Hell, with all the people there suffering, is humanly warm,” Varagic said. “So the whole script actually calls for that humanly warm place. When you read Dante, you see that hell is populated by so many people from his time and his own Florence. So the hell is the city. So we all have our own hells. It’s a call to examine our own hells.”
Varagic said she hopes the audience will pick up on this undertone. She learned early in her theatre career to “see” rather than “watch”.
“The script was written in 1993 when my country, former Yugoslavia, was falling apart,” she said. “The entire script is actually a call for people to be more aware, to feel, to love, to suffer, to be human.”
At 21, the Dante director began acting at Yugoslavia’s National Theatre, playing Shakespeare’s Juliet, then Natasha from War and Peace. Through theatre and film, she was able to travel all over the country. But when ethnic war broke out in 1991 between the Serbs on one side and Albanians, Croats and Bosniaks on the other, Varagic protested openly against the government. She felt it was her calling to make people aware. So she left the theatre, and subsequently, left Yugoslavia.
Dante was exiled from Florence and never returned, she explained. She can relate.
“He has that identity or persona of a modern immigrant. And throughout the script there is a tremendous longing for coming back.”
Varagic moved to Toronto when she was 35. She still feels an urge to speak out against war.
“It’s like the world is pregnant with tension,” Varagic said. “(Dante’s Divinus Inferno) is the call to be more aware of what’s going on in the world and take it seriously. If I make a comparison to my country: no one believed. We all thought it would just go away. It’s not true. It’s not possible.”
The theatre department chose the play and approached Varagic to direct. She says she agreed without hesitation. But it hasn’t been an easy task. She struggled through seven days of swine flu last week. She estimates half of the students involved in the production have also caught the virus. It’s been difficult to schedule rehearsals around sick students.
Yet Tuesday evening, the fourth-year class of about 20 dedicated drama students gathered in the Dunn Theatre to rehearse. While a few who weren’t in the scene sat in the audience, the rest lowered themselves onto their bellies and slithered like snakes from the sides of the stage, creeping closer to the centre where a blonde actress stood projecting prose.
Varagic said the playwright chose characters from Dante’s Inferno and put them into a narrative. For this reason the play does not have all nine circles of hell, which represent the levels of sin. Fans of Dante expecting to see a live version of his poem are in for a surprise.
The director’s commanding voice ended the scene, and her students scurried from the stage. A man holding a cello walked centre stage, pulled up a chair and began to play. Seconds later, a crowd descended on the scene. The actors walked quickly past the cellist as if unaware of his presence and music. He continued to play as if for an attentive, or empty, room.
“I have to tell you something that I didn’t want to tell you, but now I’m going to tell you,” Varagic said with a little laugh. “When I read the play, the first image that came to my mind was the cellist from Sarajevo. There is a book, which is published in Canada, about the cellist from Sarajevo, and he is the cellist that played everyday at the square in Sarajevo. So that was the image I had in mind for the play.”
In the book by Steven Galloway, the cellist plays fearlessly while all around him the world is falling apart.
“With what can we confront or face the destruction?” Varagic asks. “With beauty. That’s all we have.”

When Did You Last See My Mother?

By Anna DeMelloStaff Contributor

The month of November was a good one for theatre and performance enthusiasts in Halifax. It marked the first (and hopefully annual) theatre festival at Theatre Nova Scotia’s performance space, The Living Room, on Agricola Street. The month-long event, The Live In, is being held by DaPoPo Theatre, and has featured skill-share workshops, play readings, as well as a live performance of When Did You Last See My Mother? a play by Christopher Hampton.
The festival began on Nov. 1 with an opening gala and has since included such events as Taxes for the Self-Employed Theatre Artist, Introduction to Neutral Mask and Mask (a workshop on mask performance and the connection of the mask to the body), and Voice Work for Actors and Non-Actors.
The play is directed by Steven Bourque. It was actually written nearly 50 years ago by Christopher Hampton, but Bourque saw many parallels between its subject matter and issues dealt with by people in today’s society.
“What drew me to the play originally was the story of this one character, Iain, who is a really interesting character,” says Bourke, “Everyone is sort of a satellite to him in this play. The play was written in 1964 but it’s so contemporary in the way people talk to one another. At the time it was very kind of risqué and shocking, and was this huge expose on a very frank dealing with homosexuality. The way the characters consider themselves and the way they think about their own sexuality and personal identity seemed surprisingly contemporary to me. They have this kind of modern sensibility and are pretty relaxed about who they’re sleeping with versus who they’re in love with … or who they go to bed with when drunk at a party or something. That’s why I thought this wasn’t just a dated piece. And we aren’t trying to present this as a period piece, because the themes and topics of the play are very contemporary. People have been talking about and struggling with these ideas for like the past 50 years.”
Bourque is from Nova Scotia and grew up just outside of New Glasgow. He attended Bishop’s University in Quebec and graduated from their Drama program. His interest in directing came while at school, and he says that, because the department was fairly small, there were many opportunities for student initiatives, such as coordinating festivals, and writing and directing plays. Upon graduating in 2005, he returned to Halifax and eventually became involved with DaPoPo Theatre after meeting with Garry Williams, Artistic Director and founding member.
Bourque says that Sher Clain, now an actress in When Did You Last See My Mother, originally approached him about producing the play. They were, however, unclear about a venue for the performances, and ended up delaying production. The entire play occurs in a living room setting, and Bourque felt as though Theatre Nova Scotia’s The Living Room was the perfect venue. He also decided to make the most of the rehearsal space for the month.
“This was more affordable than other spaces,” Bourke says, “When we booked the space for the month we realized that even if we rehearsed for eight hours a day, there’s a lot of time that other things could be happening in it. We decided to fill the time with other activities. This place is really well suited to the play readings, but it’s hard to produce a conventional play here. There’s no real backstage, so we decided design-wise to just deal with the space.”
As we talk I can see that there are old television sets and video cameras set up around the room, filming the set. Bourque says that televisions and cameras have become such a language and medium for us in the early 21st century. He says that they’re part of the set as a way to present how we look at the past- namely through television documentaries or old TV shows.
Bourque says he didn’t tweak the play to make it more modern, although that was considered originally. He thought about omitting all of the dated references, and British terms like “bugger off” or “I’m going out with this bird.” However, a lot of changes would have been necessary and he was unable to obtain the playwright’s permission. Rehearsals began in September for this month’s performances.
When casting roles, Bourque says he looks for actors that are open in several senses of the word: “They need to be open to discussions with the director to portraying different characters. I like to take the time to work with people in an audition to gauge how we establish a dialogue. That kind of influences my decision about who I’d want to work with, rather than if they’d necessarily fit the role right away. It’s so hard to tell in an audition of 5 to10 minutes. An actor will evolve from when they first start rehearsing to the finished product.”
Bourque himself has a small role in the play, alongside four other actors – Sher Clain, Ambyr Dunn, Blake Prendergast and Iain Soder. Prendergast, a University of King’s College student, is in his final year of a BA in political science, and has starred in various shows with the King’s Theatrical Society.
Bourque says that this is probably one of the best casts he’s ever worked with as a director or an actor, and after seeing the play myself I’m sure he was being sincere. This production is truly entertaining and unique. It deals with relationships between roommates, friends, family members and lovers. It deals with forbidden love, relationships forever changed by sexual encounters, sexual identity, economic hardship, and family tension and expectations.
The dialogue is smart and Iain Soder steals the show with his amazing performance as the lead character. All of the actors are sensational, and seeing the play in such a tight setting is a treat. Bourque agrees that the intimate feeling of a small venue is part of what makes theatre so special, and that here in Halifax a theatre-enthusiast can satisfy their craving for a good show at a decent price at locations such as the Bus Stop Theatre on Gottingen Street, as well as The Living Room on Agricola.

Art attack

By Erica EadesStaff Contributor

Peter Dykhuis is preparing for what he believes to be the “hardest show ever to install.” As Director and Curator of the Dalhousie Art Gallery, Dykhuis has organized his fair share of exhibits. But he knows that the 56th Annual Student, Staff, Faculty and Alumni (S.S.F.A.) exhibition is going to be a challenge.
The show, which started in 1953, has existed for as long as the Gallery has been open. According to their website, the S.S.F.A. exhibit began as a way “to showcase University artistic talent and firmly identify the gallery as a university facility.”
With no visual arts department at Dalhousie, this type of event continues to provide a necessary outlet for the school’s creative students.
“A well-rounded university touches on all aspects of contemporary culture and life”, says Dykhuis. “What we’re providing to Dalhousie is the visual arts component that basically every other larger university has.”
The event is open to all members of the Dalhousie and King’s communities. Contributors can submit up to three pieces of work, which can include painting, photography, mixed media, video, sculpture and crafts.
Although the event organizers aim to include all submissions, they require that artists rank their pieces. If an abundance of work is received, the artists’ number one piece will be shown.
“I don’t stand around going, ‘This is in. That’s out,’” says Dykhuis. “It’s really meant to be a portrait of the community.”
Dykhuis also sees the event as a great opportunity for non-professional artists to have their work shown to the public.
“It shows the work that people do for themselves,” he says. “They may not sell the work, they may not want to sell the work, but it’s still absolutely worthy and socially interesting to display.”
New to the show this year is the Art of Inclusion segment. This is a collaborative project between the Dalhousie Art Gallery, Student Accessibility Services, International Students and Exchange Services and the Black Student Advising Center.
According to the Art of Inclusion application form, their hope is “to create a deeper comprehension of the changing demographics at Dalhousie and raise awareness about the importance of a welcoming and inclusive environment.” The program aims to represent a vast range of religions, races, cultures, sexual orientations and disabilities.
“That’s the second layer of experiment,” says Dykhuis. “To see what comes in from their jurisdiction and then whether or not it ends up being an exhibition within an exhibition or whether that work is spread out throughout the main exhibition.”
Organizing the main exhibit also has its difficulties. Dykhuis says part of the challenge comes from the wide range of voices present in this type of show.
“It’s multi-authored,” says Dykhuis. “If you have 40 or 50 artists, you have 40 or 50 voices.”
Dykhuis relates the set-up process to a game of Scrabble.
“When you start a game, you just kind of dump all the tiles,” he says. “At the end of a game, everyone has their tiles, and they’ve made words, and you’ve got this complete conversation. Everything links off of each other.”
Dykhuis says he searches for the artists’ intentionality when organizing this exhibit. He then analyzes the work to find commonalities in terms of subject matter and material.
“I want it to look good, but there should also be an intellectual pragmatism as to why things are beside each other,” says Dykhuis. “If you leave the person confused as to what it is they’re looking at, you’ve failed.”
Dykhuis hopes that the Student, Staff, Faculty, and Alumni show will tell a story through the collective work of the Dalhousie community.
“This is our way to reach out to the community, and just have a conversation with our neighbours,” he says.