Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Home Blog Page 566

Schulich’s weighty endowment

0

The Faculty of Law is no more. After a $20 million donation from Toronto oil and mining magnate, Seymour Schulich, set to be announced as early as Oct. 15, the faculty is to be rechristened the Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law.

If the name sounds familiar, there’s good reason. As of May 2008, the National Post reported that the billionaire businessman and philanthropist had donated in excess of $250 million to post-secondary institutions in Canada alone. Entire faculties at York University, Western, Calgary and McGill bear his name.

But Schulich’s generous donations haven’t been without controversy.

Most recently, in 2006, students at the University of Western Ontario protested Schulich’s $26 million donation to their school of medicine and dentistry.

“He has no link to health at all except that he has been directly responsible or slightly removed from the responsibility in the destruction of a lot of people’s health,” Western medical student Tarek Loubani told Western’s student newspaper, The Gazette.

Controversy has centred around Schulich’s involvement with the Newmont Mining Corporation, the world’s largest gold producer, and with the Canadian Oil Sands Trust.

Newmont Mining’s practices have come under heavy scrutiny in places like Peru, Indonesia, Ghana, and Romania, where the company has at different times found itself embroiled in disputes with indigenous peoples and NGOs over issues of human rights and environmental degradation.

Schulich was the director of Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation when it merged with Newmont, and he retained a significant stake and influence in the new company.

In Ghana, Newmont faced allegations of displacement of farmers and land appropriation. As recently as this past summer, the Financial Intelligence, a private Ghanaian newspaper, accused Newmont Ghana of bribing local chiefs in an attempt to gain access to areas within the Ajenjua Bepo Forest Reserve.
In January, during an interview with the Financial Post, Schulich described his relationship with Newmont as that of “a consultant” to the company.

In 2006, while Schulich was Chairman of Newmont Capital, the mining corporation’s financial subsidiary, the company was forced to temporarily shut down its operations in northern Peru after peasant farmers blockaded a road in opposition to a proposed expansion of the company’s Yanacocha mine, the second-largest gold mine in the world. Farmers wanted to prevent further damage to streams and lakes in the area.

Here in Canada, Schulich is a major stakeholder in the Canadian Oil Sands Trust, a company that controls some 37 per cent of Syncrude Canada, the world’s largest producer of crude synthetic oil from oil sands projects.

Last year, the company made headlines when Greenpeace staged a demonstration to draw attention to the negative effects that Syncrude’s Aurora oil sands project was having on wildlife in Alberta. According to Pollution Watch, Syncrude is one of Canada’s worst polluters.

In an internal e-mail circulated within the law school this past week, Phillip Saunders, Dean of Dalhousie’s Law School, offered nothing in the way of background on the school’s generous new benefactor.

Saunders celebrated Schulich’s endowment, praising the donation for being “the largest ever provided to a Canadian law school.” He wrote that the greatest portion of the gift “will be dedicated to creating 41 new scholarships,” the first of which could be distributed as early as this year.

According to the e-mail, the endowment will also fund internships, exchange programs, clinical education (including Dalhousie Legal Aid), and will go to improving the law library’s holdings. The Weldon Law Building on University Avenue will also undergo renovations.

Saunders said students interested in discussing Schulich’s endowment could do so at a soon-to-be-announced meeting held by Dalhousie administrators. No date has been set for this meeting.

Thanksgiving ideas

0

Thanksgiving weekend shouldn’t involve eating a TV dinner and fretting over Tuesday’s essay deadline. But it’s a reality for students who can’t dish out the cash for a plane ticket or justify the long trip for a short-lived weekend. There are other ways to enjoy Turkey Day in Halifax. Here are a few ideas:

Maritime Fall Fair
Hop on your bike and head to Exhibition Park for local food, horse competitions and barrel-racing. The day at Prospect Road costs $11 for adults and runs from Oct. 9 to 18. So those Thanksgiving home-bodies can still participate.

Go to the valley
Ask your friend with wheels to take you for a day. Nova Scotia boasts a beautiful fall and the Annapolis Valley is a prime spot to appreciate it. Hit up the Saturday market in Wolfville, the Pumpkin Regatta in Windsor or Noggins Farm in Greenwich for apple-picking.

Haunted Corn Maze
It’s a little early for Halloween, but on Oct. 10 you can participate in the River Breeze Haunted Corn Maze, just outside Truro. The 12-acre trek charges $14 per person. Too scary? You can buy a $9 ticket every Saturday, Sunday and Thanksgiving Day for the regular Corn Maze. That daytime price includes other activities like a wagon ride through a pumpkin patch and laser tag.

Propeller Brewery
It’s Pumpkin Ale time! Grab your growler and walk to Propeller Brewery on Gottingen Street. They only brew the flavour in October so get it while you can. Mugs of this beer are also available at The Foggy Goggle.

Volunteer at Hope Cottage
Pile plates with food for the needier. Over 30 years old, Hope Cottage provides thousands of meals on a monthly basis and Thanksgiving Day is no exception. Last year, the organization dished out almost 200 meals.

Attempt your own Thanksgiving dinner
Roll up your sleeves and cook up a meal for your friends. Better yet, make it a potluck where everyone brings a different component to a Thanksgiving meal. That way no one can blame you when the mashed potatoes turn out runny. We recommend www.allrecipes.com for meal ideas.

A program with “distinct influence”

0

Bhreagh Kennedy is about to meet her buddy for the first time. She joined Best Buddies – a national organization dedicated to building strong friendships between student volunteers and adults with intellectual disabilities. Dalhousie University and the University of King’s College participate in the program. The schools pair student volunteers with buddies for meetings twice a month and weekly phone calls or e-mails.

Kennedy, who has a younger sister with Down syndrome, knows working with people with intellectual disabilities can be intimidating. She says in this program “you are simply their buddy, not their babysitter.”  The co-ordinators provide a support system for the student volunteers so “the responsibilityis totally manageable,” she says.

George Reid has been with Best Buddies for over 10 years and has had four student volunteers buddied with him.

“If I didn’t like it, I wouldn’t be here,” he says with a grin.

Reid, now a buddy advocate for the program, gives speeches and participates in other forms of public speaking. He plans to stick with Best Buddies for years to come.

“It has a distinct influence on their lives,” says Asher Goldstein, chapter co-ordinator at the University of King’s College.

Goldstein, who’s in his second year with the organization, says he’s encountered difficulties. His buddy is much older, making it difficult to find common interests. He says he still found the past year a great experience.

“We do all kinds of things when we hang out like going out for a movie, coffee or winter surfing. We went bowling a number of times last year and I got my butt kicked,” says Goldstein laughing.

The organization faces many challenges. There are a large number of students whose inconsistency causes problems for their buddies.

“Being forgotten is hurtful to anybody but it gets amplified for the individuals with intellectual disabilities, as this is a special thing for them. They really look forward to these get-togethers and when you stop coming it hurts them a lot more,” says Goldstein.

“Students tend to fall through,” adds Laura Hochman, another chapter co-ordinator. This is an unfortunate reality to program that requires a year-long commitment.

To support the volunteers, Best Buddies hosts group outings where all the pairs meet for different activities.

“They are lots of fun for everyone and this way if you can’t make it out it’s okay. But ultimately it is a big responsibility for the volunteer that has to be taken seriously,” says Hochman.

According to the Best Buddies homepage, “individuals with intellectual disabilities have a lifelong impairment to a person’s ability to learn or adapt to their environments.” This doesn’t include mental illness, psychological disabilities, learning disabilities, or a psychiatric condition. Autism and Down syndrome are examples of intellectual disabilities.

Student volunteers are paired with their buddies through an interview process and matched based on compatibility. The deadline for student applications to volunteer with someone for a year-long commitment to Best Buddies through the University of King’s College is Oct. 30, 2009.

The Dalhousie University chapter is soon closing its applications for the upcoming year. Anyone wishing to get involved can check out www.bestbuddies.ca.

A counterculture gone wrong

0

OTTAWA (CUP) – Hipster. To most human beings, the very word triggers a subconscious sneer. Hipsters are the kids in dirty hoodies and skinny jeans who skulk around shopping mall entrances, snickering at everyone who walks by. But they can also be spotted all over town; like cockroaches, they squeeze their way into every corner of the city, just as they squeeze their way into their tiny, Gap Kids-sized wardrobes.

Not unlike a virus, aspects of hipster style slowly infect other social groups, subtly spreading hipster trends, overwhelming pre-existing customs, and blurring the lines, until the borrowed hipster standards become the mainstream norm. Case in point: photos of Paris Hilton wearing lens-less, thick-framed glasses in “geek chic” hipster style recently made the rounds on the Internet.

But while there are certain ideals within the hipster culture that elicit rage from some, other principles are too intriguing to dismiss. The alternative culture hipsters offer – their anti-capitalist, laissez-faire, “we don’t give a fuck” attitude to mainstream society – is just too appealing to ignore.

Unfortunately, the underlying value at the core of hipsterism is antipathy, which is also what will lead to its inevitable demise.

In the beginning, there was hepcat

Michael Mulvey, assistant professor of marketing at the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Management, researches consumer behaviour and has taken an informal interest in subcultures. He explained that the title of “hipster” originated during the early 1940s hot-jazz boom. It replaced “hepcat,” a term applied to young black people (and eventually white people as well) who were ahead of the trend when it came to jazz music. During that time, those labelled as hipsters were more socially progressive (anti-segregation), sexually adventurous and had open, liberal views of drugs.

Eventually, these hipsters grew up and their children became what we now know as the “hippie generation” of the mid 1960s and 1970s. Hippies espoused a philosophy of acceptance, peace, love and equality, but the movement eventually died down. From the mid 1990s, their children began to emerge as the new generation of contemporary hipsters.

Later called “traditional hipsters,” these early hipsters were part of an alternative culture that preached a low-tech, anti-corporate, working class ideology. They promoted the open and accepting ideals that previous rebel generations also championed.

Hipsterism 101

Today, the hipster is the ultimate person of the people. A working class scion, the hipster is one to take pride in his or her lower class roots and to attempt to live as simple an existence as possible. This means living cheaply, buying second-hand clothes, organic foods and cheap beer, as well as living in rough, urban neighbourhoods for the low rent.

Living an actively anti-corporate lifestyle is also a very hipster thing to do. This means not spending $20 on a Britney Spears CD, and instead going out in search of obscure, unknown bands that play coffee houses and underground clubs. The reason? The hipster is a patron of the arts. A hipster prefers the alternative scene, as these artists are still honing their craft – largely unaffected by the corporate world – and as such, are more “legitimate.”

A second-year business management student and self-described hipster who goes by the name Alouiscious Yeaah, aged 19, describes how central music and the do-it-yourself attitude are to the hipster lifestyle.

“We listen to a lot of techno, some Steve Aoki, he’s all right,” says Yeaah. “We usually just dance in a friend’s apartment. I’m a DJ, so I just bring my own speakers and laptop, and we just dance.”

But the hipster’s aesthetic appreciation isn’t confined to music alone; the hipster also immerses him or herself in the visual arts scene, visiting small galleries showcasing up-and-coming artists; the literary scene, participating in intellectually prestigious book circles; and the fashion scene, taking special pains to support local do-it-yourselfers.

Mulvey calls these types of hipsters “authentic hipsters,” while most people know them as “traditional hipsters.”

The once fringe culture that had managed to fly under the radar has slowly begun to creep its way into the mainstream. And in the early 2000s, when Ashton Kutcher insisted on single-handedly taking the ironic trucker-hat trend to a whole new unoriginal level, hipsterism officially became the latest cultural punching bag.

Mulvey explained that, similar to other alternative cultures that found themselves crossing into the mainstream, hipsterism is becoming conventionalized, and it’s time for the movement to take a cultural beating.

“(Hipsters have become) a bit too recognizable, and not unlike the head-bangers and the hip-hoppers, it’s time to take their thumps,” he says. “These things are very cyclical; one group gets marginalized and they take their turn in line for a beating, and it all gets reinvented again.”

Hipsterism, which was originally concentrated in the poorer areas of urban America, such as New York City’s Lower East Side, has managed to take root in other large urban areas, like Toronto.

Due to the movement’s expansion, hipsterism’s profile among the mainstream began to rise, and society welcomed it with open arms. Hence, what Mulvey calls “inauthentic hipsters,” or “ironic hipsters,” were born.

Ironic versus authentic

The ironic hipster is the creature responsible for today’s hipster backlash, according to Mulvey.

“(They’re the) imitative kind; they are trying so hard to be cool,” he explains. “The Offspring had a song called ‘Pretty Fly for a White Guy,’ where this guy is trying so hard to be cool, trying to dress right, listen to the (right) music, get a tattoo and drive the right car. There’s nothing that kills cool quicker than trying too hard. And when you have enough wannabes visibly trying to be part of something that is a little bit exclusionist and elitist and fringe, it really doesn’t fly.”

The authentic hipster insists on living and being entrenched in the culture’s true lower-class roots.
“[Authentic] hipsters are supposed to be people among the literati. They’re supposed to read. There’s real work involved in being a hipster,” says Mulvey.

The inauthentic hipster, on the other hand, likes to skim.

And that’s where the great hipster schism occurs. Being a traditional hipster is a full-time job, says Mulvey.

“The broader (hipster) lifestyle requires investment, and you may not want all that baggage,” he suggests. “And that’s maybe why there are the two streams of hipsters. Some people are seekers of the new, the patrons of the arts. They’re the real hipsters. Then there are others (who) come to it in a different way, that don’t necessarily buy into it all. People can choose how far they want to get into the subculture. It’s not all or nothing. You can cherry pick. If you want a fancy academic word for it: bricoleurs. They pick and choose. … There are so many sources for inspiration.”

As a result, hipsterism’s appropriation of different aspects from varying cultural genres is more of a fusionof the best of the best, not necessarily counterfeit.

The ironic hipster, however, can generally be described as a well-off, middle class kid who is trying to act like a poor kid. The ironic hipster jumps from one cool trend to the next. One day it’s a neon keffiyeh (otherwise known as the now ubiquitous hipster scarves, which are, in fact, Arab headwear worn by left wingers as a public sign of solidarity for Palestinians), the next it’s lens-less Buddy Holly frames.

The ironic hipster can be easily spotted in a crowd. They’re the ones who buy overpriced leotards from American Apparel and love the choppy dance music of Girl Talk.

Nineteen-year-old Lee Jones, a second-year English major at the University of Ottawa who is part of Ottawa’s hipster scene, describes the established uniform of the ironic hipster as v-neck sweaters, expensive and time consuming bed-head haircuts, lens-less thick-framed glasses, skinny jeans and tight t-shirts with prints of obscure pop-culture references.

However, Jones doesn’t like the term “hipster.”

“(It’s) because of the connotation. I’m hip, rather than a hipster,” she explains. “I wear actual vintage clothing and have a pair of moccasins. I’m a cheap indie kid – the perpetual poor student. Then there are the hipster kids who wear head-to-toe American Apparel, and it all costs over $200. It’s bought hipsterism.”

Despite the potential for negative association, Yeaah doesn’t mind the label.

“I am a hipster,” he says. “I’m not offended by that title.”

Anti-hipsterism justified

The anti-hipster rage has been building steadily for the last few years. Writer Douglas Haddow eloquently explains (and supports) the phenomenon in the September/October 2008 issue of Adbusters.

Titled “Hipsters: The Dead End of Western Civilization,” Haddow’s story describes hipsterism as hollow, built entirely on the “artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras.”

Haddow writes, “The hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. … The ‘hipster’ (is) a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.”

Essentially, the main argument against hipsterism is based on its hypocrisy. The once proud, anti-corporate, blue-collar-loving, alternative lifestyle has become a shell of its former self.

“In 2008, such things have become shameless clichés of a class of individuals that seek to escape their own wealth and privilege by immersing themselves in the aesthetic of the working class,” Haddow writes.

The main drive of the traditional hipsters was, according to Mulvey, the “legitimate, sincere quest for the new. There are some people who just want to see it done in a different way. Some people have an appetite for discovery.”

Today, this individual quest for the new seems to have shifted from discovering obscure new bands to scrolling through the top albums on iTunes.

“Hipsterdom is the first ‘counterculture’ to be born under the advertising industry’s microscope, leaving it open to constant manipulation but also forcing its participants to continually shift their interests and affiliations,” writes Haddow. “Less a subculture, the hipster is a consumer group – using their capital to purchase empty authenticity and rebellion.”

Basically, when hipsters claim to be anti-corporate and anti-mainstream, they deviate from their label as an alternative culture and move more toward a counterculture. But to be a true counterculture, they must totally embrace the complete hipster lifestyle. That means turning your back on materialism, consumerism and capitalism. But because of this skimming, this “fauxhemian” way of living the hipster style, hipsters have inadvertently and inevitably become an advertising agent’s wet dream.

So while the hipsters may seem to be outwardly embracing radical values and ideas, they do in fact all adhere to a strict set of pre-determined cultural guidelines that govern the hipster world. This sense of elitism breeds hatred and contempt from the mainstream as everything the majority holds dear is looked down upon by hipsters as kitsch.

In the end, the once liberal, anti-corporate, lower class traditional hipsters have morphed into the superficial, hollow consumer group of ironic hipsters. But they are only the latest in a long line of alternative cultures, and before long, they too will die out. And the western world will find a new subculture to hate.

The women united, will never be defeated

0

The words “feminist” and “march” don’t sit comfortably in the same phrase for many people. Visions of the 1970s women’s liberation movement, bra-burnings and Birkenstocks inevitably come to mind. The Take Back the Night march on Oct. 2, was a far cry from a hippie peace rally.

Originally aimed at reclaiming unsafe streets, neighbourhoods and campuses, Take Back the Night is now a recognized movement for solidarity towards women’s rights. Looking to empower women to reclaim the right to live free of the fear of sexual violence, Take Back the Night was a grand success in Halifax this year.

The night began with a fiercely impassioned rally in Victoria Park, where representatives of various women’s groups and community organizations spoke, and an open mic was facilitated to allow others to participate.

Young women shared deeply personal poems and reflections, adding to the atmosphere of solidarity. Crowd members were an eclectic group – students, mothers and young daughters, male supporters and allies, and a diverse group of women. The energy was palpable as the crowd of hundreds moved from Victoria Park to march through downtown Halifax.

The march had a powerful and liberating tone. Shouting chants and linking arms, we were greeted with jubilant car horns and waving supporters.

For many, the march embodies a desire to express both female solidarity and discontent with the abuses of women in our society. The march becomes both a symbolic and literal act, with women joining together to reclaim both a time and a place that have become unsafe. Living in a city, and being a woman, many take for granted the adage of, “You just shouldn’t go there at night.”

The march was evidence of a vibrant, powerful community of both women and allies who are dedicated to making Halifax a safer place. With the Dalhousie “Sleep Watcher” still at large, the march was a proclamation that women in Halifax are not content to remain victimized.

“It’s ridiculous that they haven’t caught him yet – 15 times in one year he’s broken into girls’ apartments,” said Dalhousie student Arielle Goldschlager. “Police in the south end are more concerned with giving out noise complaint tickets.”

Take Back the Night was an effective show of how women’s solidarity can bring visibility to real issues. As female students at Dalhousie, we should refuse to be victimized; either by the Sleep Watcher, chauvinistic frat boys at the bar, or men who joke about “educating women.”

I don’t want my little sister growing up in a world where men say things like that. We’ve gained a lot of ground in the past 40 years, but we still have a long way to go.

Empowerment, community keys to fighting sexual assault

Eight per cent.

That’s the number of sexual assaults that, according to the General Social Survey by Juristat Canada, get reported each year.

If this number is correct, then the actual number of sexual assaults is eighteen times the number that are reported. In real terms, that means that since 765 sexual offenses were reported to the police in 2007 in Nova Scotia, the actual number of sexual assaults in a year in this fine province looks a lot more like 9,563.

Hence, I put on my wooly black pea coat, drew a sign and spent my Friday night marching down the street to reclaim my right to live a life free of sexual violence.

With hundreds of other fabulous women surrounding me, I got ready to repossess the city that, according to Maclean’s magazine, has the third highest per capita rate of sexual assault in the country.

As women and allies all walked together, refusing to accept violence against women, I began to ponder: how can women best work to prevent violence against women in their communities? How can we band together in the face of such hopeless statistics and refuse to be victimized?

Posters, pamphlets and other propaganda pieces constantly reinforce reminders to women to do things that they usually knew about before. Watch your drink. Don’t go down certain streets late at night. Ask a boy to walk you home. Don’t ask a boy to walk you home. Go in groups. Wear jeans. (Actually, don’t, because if you do get raped in jeans, it might take from 1999 until 2008 for an Italian court to recognize that your denim does not make sexual assault an impossibility.)

Obviously, this safety advice can be helpful and is worth paying attention to. But there’s a point when these tips become more than common sense suggestions. Rather, they become implicit rules for where you live, how you get to work and how you live your life.

Jessica Valenti, author of Full Frontal Feminism, describes this system of rules as a daily, lifelong “rape schedule,” that’s when the safety suggestions become victim-blaming.

“It’s essentially like living in a prison – all the time. We can’t assume that we’re safe anywhere. Not on the streets. Not in our homes,” Valenti writes in her book. “And we’re so used to feeling unsafe that we don’t see that there’s something seriously fucked up about it.”

The most frustrating thing about living your life on this clock is that it doesn’t even work. In 2005, according to the Nova Scotia Advisory Council on the status of women, 68 per cent of sexual assaults were committed by individuals actually known to the victim.

So what the hell do we do about these numbers? How do we empower women in the fight against violence without being paternalistic or placing onus on the victim?

One volunteer at the march who wished not to be named argued that the quandary I have is stupid.

“If I suggest you wash your hands after you eat, is that blaming the victim?” she asked, wittily.

The difference between being supportive and paternalistic, she explained, lies in the desire to create a space where women have choices.

The best way to support women in the long term, we agreed, is to resist the black and white framework that suggests that women must consistently choose between assault or living their lives freely.

On a practical note, how about having more sexual assault centres? Right now, Nova Scotia has two. Two! One is in Halifax and one is in Truro.

Maybe we could write to our police officers. In 2006, the proportion of sexual assaults in Nova Scotia that actually resulted in the laying of a charge was lower than in all the other provinces and territories. That’s not a competition I want to win.

Geneva McCall and Kathleen Hamm, two other women present at the march, also emphasized the importance of community building outside of the traditional justice and government frameworks.

McCall underlined the importance of trying to help women around you to feel empowered, while Hamm spoke of building a sense of community.

“Be mindful,” Hamm said, “to not … feed into negativity, (but rather) look out for other women and be aware.”

So carry your pepper spray, get a ride home, demand a cab chit from your place of employment and watch your drink. But remember that these behaviours are not solutions to the problem of violence against women, but reminders of it.

When you’re seated on your comfy living room couch with all your doors locked to prevent the Sleep Watcher and you’ve made a hot cocoa, take a moment to think about how you want to create lasting, long term change that makes sexual and gendered violence unthinkable. And then tell me how the hell we should do that, because the more I think about it, the more I find myself at a loss.

Not your average jazz

At first glance, professor Tim Crofts may seem like your average Dalhousie music professor. But what many people don’t know is that he is actually a reincarnation of the late, great jazz pianist Thelonious Monk.

Okay, that might be a stretch. But he is a cool guy who, like Monk, has a completely original vision of jazz composition. He is unique. He is focused. Most importantly, he is courageous, and certainly not afraid of taking risks.

“I’m always trying to explore all the different elements and push myself to the limits,” says Crofts, 34.

“Every time I play I want to discover something new.”

The pianist’s upcoming show at the Paragon Theatre, Upstream 6.0: Pushing Jazz To Its Limits, is sure to be anything but old news. The performance, scheduled for Oct. 11, will be mostly improvised, engaging the audience in spontaneous music.

Each member of Crofts’ sextet brings a key element to the show’s jazz fusion. The ensemble includes Rick Waychesko on trumpet, Paul Cram on tenor sax, Geordie Haley on guitar, Adam Linson on bass, and Mark Adam on drums. Because the Paragon does not have a piano, Crofts will be experimenting with electronics, analog synthesizers, and Kaoss pads, among other instruments.

“I don’t really see myself as a pianist,” says the Yarmouth-born professor, who also plays guitar and flute.

“I mean, I’m a pretty good pianist. But ultimately I see myself as a musician, and the piano is my tool to create that music.”

From influences ranging from Bach and Beethoven, to Miles Davis and Duke Ellington, to Jimi Hendrix and the Wu Tang Clan, Crofts sees himself as a “fairly global musician.”

But Crofts did not always know he would end up working with music. While growing up in Halifax, he began learning piano at age seven, but quit it just two years later. After graduating from Queen Elizabeth High he decided to enroll in Dalhousie’s science program. Not until he took a year abroad in Europe did he realize piano was his true calling.

Upon returning to Halifax at age 19, he took up piano lessons again and switched his major to composition. He then obtained his Masters of Music in Contemporary Improvisation from the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston. He has been teaching music courses including The History of Rock n’ Roll and The History of Jazz at Dalhousie for the past three years. This year he is also teaching four other music courses at Nova Scotia Community College. All of this on top of his music career.

There is a long tradition of musicians who perform music, create music and teach music. Crofts is one of those musicians. He acknowledges that performing on stage and performing in a classroom is “exactly the same thing.” Both his music and his lectures are largely improvised. In each setting, his main priority is to engage his audience and broaden their horizons.

Crofts also likes to push his own boundaries to the edge, made clear by his eccentric practice of placing non-traditional objects in the piano to change its resonance.

“One day my doorknob fell off,” he says. “So I put it in my piano.”

Inspired by composer John Cage, Crofts has used everything from billiard balls to drumsticks with his piano – all in the pursuit of musical exploration.

“It’s healthy to embrace things that you can’t understand,” he says.

He encourages everyone – university students in particular – to have the courage to leave their comfort zones and experience music they don’t know anything about. He believes that almost anybody can listen to his music and get something out of it in an experiential sense.

“There was a time when experimental music of many kinds was really supported by university students,” he says. “It would be nice to see more come out.”

Crofts attributes many young people’s reluctance to jazz due to their association of the genre being “dinner music” or “music that you relax to.” He, on the other hand, sees the music as something that is not genre specific, as an entity that has the capability to “reveal amazing things to you.”

Crofts insists it’s not about “super-trained individuals in the ivory tower,” but instead about building a culture and community of the music. He stresses the need for people to become involved in the process, to not be afraid, and to take risks.

“It’s all-consuming,” he says. “You have to surrender yourself to the music.”

Pumpkin beer is here

Pumpkins are fun to carve. Beer is delicious. The innovative beer masters at Propeller Brewery have decided to combine these popular fall items into one multi-tasking beverage: pumpkin ale.

Spicy, sweet and fresh, Propeller’s seasonal beer is made with Howard Dill’s Atlantic Giant Pumpkins and has been around since 2004.

This year’s batch was released this October after weeks of careful brewing.

Rebecca Milton, a Saint Mary’s University student and employee at Propeller says the pumpkin beer is in high demand in Halifax.

“I can tell you that everyone who comes in asks about it,” she says. “All day, every day, for the past two months.”

The brew is made from a secret recipe that combines fresh pumpkin with spices and all the usual beer ingredients like malt, hops and yeast.

Milton, who had never tasted the final product, was excited for the tentative release date of Sept. 29.
“I couldn’t wait, so I tried it a couple of weeks ago,” she said. “It definitely wasn’t ready yet.”

The beer is only made once a year, in limited quantity. Two tanks were made, which equals approximately 500 growlers or 1000 litres of beer.

The beer is available by the bottle or the growler – popular refillable two-litre jugs. Interested beer lovers can find pumpkin ale at the Propeller Brewery on 2011 Gottingen Street, or at select bars like The Foggy Goggle, before it’s gone.

Undefeated

0

We’re used to having good things at Dalhousie. Yet we always think of ourselves as small. Maybe it’s the influence of Halifax, the small seaside city in eastern Canada. Maybe it’s that we’re always comparing ourselves to McGill and the University of Toronto. Or perhaps we’re just used to ignoring our men’s volleyball team, who are amazingly talented. Whatever the reason, we have a bit of an inferiority complex.

Not known traditionally known for Athletics and despite budget cuts, recent years have seen Dal field championship teams in nearly every sport. Some of the best swimmers, sailors and volleyball players in Canada wear Dal Black and Gold, we field the best rugby team this side of the Rockies and have a men’s hockey team laden with NHL-calibre talent. Could undefeated Dal Soccer teams be the next big thing to come out of Dal?

It was a little hard to figure out what to think last year when both our soccer teams made CIS nationals by winning the AUS playoffs (or, in the women’s case, coming second). It had been a long time since 2000 when we last won CIAU nationals. It’s a different league now – more schools, different name and better competition. It was especially shocking for our men’s team, who finished last in 2007 and won only one game.

As a result, we weren’t too shocked when both our teams bombed out of Nationals. The women were beaten 4-0 by a middle of the road Victoria Vikes team. The men lost 2-0 to the powerful Montreal Carabins, and managed to win a consolation match and finish sixth. “Oh well,” we thought, “back to being small again.”

This year, Tigers soccer has made huge improvements. Where last year was hard to watch at times, this year has seen exciting soccer on Wickwire Field. Attacking soccer. Quick passing and clinical finishing as opposed to last year’s “bunker down and hope Ben Ur or Heather Armstrong can save it” strategy.
That’s why we’re focussing this issue on the soccer teams – because it’s kind of hard to predict what they’ll do this year. What should we expect, anyway?

Men

This team is radically different from last year. The defence is still solid and Ben Ur can still save it. But now there’s Michel Daoust and Hamzeh Afani to score goals. The chemistry these two have developed with Ross Hagen, Wes Hawley, Eric Negulic and the other Tiger players has been considerable.
They’ve scored quite a few goals, too, with 17 this year so far – far more than any AUS team. This is a very, very good team. As you can see in this week’s Dalhousie-Memorial story, Memorial coach Scott Betts said his team were outmatched and outplayed in every position. Memorial are not a great team, nor are they an altogether bad team.

This men’s team is a men’s team that needs to be compared to CIS competition. This team is clearly on another level, a level above the physical, chippy AUS.

That, though, gives us our problem of expectations. To get to Nationals, the Tigers must win a two to three game knockout playoff. Anything can happen in those games – injuries, refereeing decisions, soft goals. All could send Dalhousie down in flames.

As fans, can we expect them to overcome that? If this team is as good as it looks, then it should. Dalhousie have now played everyone except UPEI. They’ve beaten just about everyone handily, with the exception of UNB and U de M.

Playoffs are playoffs, but Dalhousie are hosting and have played well at home this year (UNB and U de M were on the road), bouyed by some strong support organised from the residences. Howe Hall have a group about 50 strong and Shirreff Hall a group of about 25. I think it’s safe to assume Wickwire will be packed for the AUS finals, and I think we can expect that Dalhousie will play in them.

Remember, though. That’s the equivalent of a game seven in the Stanley Cup finals. Red Wings fans won’t need reminding what can happen to teams expecting to win. Ur pretty much single-handedly sent the Tigers to Nationals last year. Someone will have to lead them this year, too.

Women

The women’s team is also improved, mainly with experience. It’s a union of captains in Teresa Morrison and Ashley Donald, who join co-captains Jeanette Huck and Kate MacDonald. Leadership won’t be a problem. Motivation shouldn’t be a problem.

Scoring has been easier for Dal this year (they scored the second fewest goals in AUS last year) with help from Joanna Blodgett and Emma Landry, but that remains secondary scoring. Kate MacDonald is still the only consistent offensive threat. Katie Richard and Ashley Donald chip in but often drop to midfield when the Tigers need to defend.

That means much of the secondary scoring is coming from rookies who have never played in AUS playoffs before. While they come quite highly rated, this, as Blodgett has said, is another level.
There was some question as to how much the Tigers deserved to be at Nationals last year, as they played pretty badly in the playoffs and lost in the final. But two AUS teams got in last year and they joined the Capers in British Columbia.

Those questions were exacerbated by their thrashing at the hands of University of Victoria. It was a performance that didn’t feature many Dalhousie chances and also showed signs of weakness in an otherwise solid AUS defence.

And therein is the trick: AUS is a gritty, physical league. Few goals are scored. The skill level is a bit lower. Dalhousie’s defenders can cut it at that level, but faced with a dynamic player such as Nikki Wright or a power player such as Daniela Gerig (both Trinity Western players featured heavily in last year’s CIS win) it gets a lot harder.

So what do we expect of the Tigers? Only one AUS team will go to Nationals this year. Cape Breton have a significant edge. There have been a lot of close games for Dalhousie this year. They have the parts to win the AUS playoffs, but expecting that might be too much, especially given its being played in PEI, away from the friendly confines of Wickwire field. It will also be played on UPEI’s grass field, whereas the Tigers are used to playing on field turf.

Women’s Seahawks shut out by Tigers

0

They needed time, but eventually the Dalhousie Tigers women’s soccer team broke through the Memorial Seahawks last Friday to take the game at Wickwire Field 1-0. Katie Richard won the game in second half stoppage time. Tigers’ coach Jack Hutchison still isn’t happy with his team, though.

“We’re still not gelling,” says Hutchison. “We’re not doing some simple things well.”

It wasn’t an exhibition of great soccer. Neither team looked comfortable, especially in defence. A rain-slicked turf field didn’t help, either. Both teams made huge defensive errors all afternoon.

For Memorial, a lot of those errors originated with striker Laura Breen, who was playing out of position in central defence. Her marking was poor and she consistently let Richard and Kate MacDonald in behind her. Malorie Harris also became a liability in her own box, consistently misplaying clearances or obstructing her goalkeeper’s view of shots.

Dalhousie also had defensive problems. Stephanie Crewe looked lost for much of the game, a symptom on display early on when she nearly impeded goalkeeper Heather Armstrong as she tried to claim a ball. It wasn’t just rookie mistakes, though; even steady centre back Amanda Henry had a rough game, struggling to deal with Victoria Thistle.

The Tigers picked it up in the second half, and began to force more mistakes out of Memorial. Breen headed a Tiger cross off her own crossbar after ‘keeper Keira Eavis was left out of position.
Appropriately, the winning goal was a comedy of errors from everyone involved. In second half injury time, right back Jamie Warren passed straight to Kate MacDonald who was really too far wide to shoot.

With pretty much the last chance of the game, she decided to shoot anyway, and Eavis made what looked to be an easy save before she dropped the ball straight onto Richard’s foot. Richard couldn’t take a clean shot, but did manage to bundle the ball into the net for the winning goal.

Unofficial Stats:
Goals: Dal-1; MUN-0
Shots: Dal-6; MUN-4
Attempts: Dal-11; MUN-6
Fouls: Dal-10; MUN-10
Cautions: Dal-0; MUN-1 (36’ Dawe)
Ejections: Dal-0; MUN-0
Corners: Dal-7; MUN-3
Offsides: Dal-1; MUN-0