How the 2025 Emmys turned generosity into a gimmick
The award show played fast and loose with money for charity
Award shows are traditions meant to celebrate artists, but the 77th Primetime Emmy Awards found a way to undermine its own purpose by placing a dollar sign on the speeches that everyone is there to see.
The first clip I saw from the Emmys this year was Hannah Einbinder’s acceptance speech for outstanding supporting actress in a comedy series for her role in Hacks, which she concluded by saying, “Fuck ICE, and free Palestine.”
Usually, a political statement as direct as that would pull focus at an award show, but I couldn’t take my eyes off the actively decreasing money value displayed on the bottom right corner of the screen.
Comedian and host Nate Bargatze kicked off the show by pledging to donate $100,000 of his own money to the Boys and Girls Club of America. But, he added a caveat to incentivize award winners to stay within the 45 second acceptance speech time limit.
Bargatze said that he’d take away $1,000 from his pledge for every second an award winner went over the time limit, and would add $1,000 to his donation for every second they went under.
The Boys and Girls Club of America is a non-profit organization that provides after-school programs to children across the United States. The Emmys’ latest gimmick could have cost those children a life-changing difference.
There is no problem with wanting shorter speeches, but instead of fixing the issue, the Emmys stunt forced viewers to watch money for charity burn.
“It’s brutal. What are you gonna do, though?” said Bargatze at the beginning of the ceremony. “I can’t change it. This is a game I made up, and these are the rules.”
Can you imagine winning your first award, being recognized for performing at the highest level, and the only thing running through your mind is to keep your acceptance speech under 45 seconds, or else you’re actively taking money away from charity?
Einbinder counteracted this issue by saying she’d “pay the difference” of the donation after going over the 45 second time limit.
The best award show moments tend to come from the acceptance speeches, but Bargatze ripped that away by making winners feel rushed by a forced moral implication. Meanwhile, no timer ticked for Bargatze, giving him plenty of time to comment on the donation counter and how it continued to plummet as the show went on.
There was enough wealth concentrated in that room to match Bargatze’s donation thousands of times over. The out of touch timer turned the original pledge into a performance, rather than a genuine act of generosity.
At the end of the event, the donation counter had plummeted so far below zero that it was no longer displayed.
Bargatze announced $350,000 would still be donated to the Boys and Girls Club — including $250,000 out of his own pocket.
Money for charity might be good, but it would be much more impactful if the generosity weren’t conditional on keeping artists from thanking their mothers.
Turning a charity donation into a game is odd enough. Doing it in a room full of multi-millionaires is the cherry on top.
